Narus.Info

And he is correct. We do have a violent, fascist movement in this country. They killed 168 people in Oklahoma City in 1995. These fascists killed innocent people at the Olympics in Atlanta in 1996, and innocent people working at women’s clinics across the US in the 1990s, including policemen. Right this very minute, they are arming themselves more and more, while proclaiming that the Obama administration is going to persecute them because of this political assassination, perpetrated by one of their own, after much harassment of the victim by the most-viewed cable news television figure in the United States.

This is a correction from my previous diary about Taguba. The UK telegraph incorrectly concluded that the photographs Taguba acknowledges from Abu Ghraib, and the 44 being withheld in an ACLU lawsuit by Obama, are the same thing. Apparently there is either little, or no overlap whatsoever, between the Abu Ghraib photos that Taguba has seen and confirmed as showing evidence of rape in Abu Ghraib, and the 44 photographs requested by the ACLU.

This is American terrorism in the same vein as the Oklahoma City bombing and Eric Rudolph. These people have to be stopped, it will be revealed that the killer located the doctor with help from people on the internet.

This is crossing a line if you ask me, a line of cowardice. The Uighurs pose no threat, and would probably be fine in Indonesia, so what if they state in the states for a while. In my opinion it is very wrong for any President of the US to show any fear whatsoever of the inmates in Guantanamo Bay.

In an interview with Salon, Taguba points out that the torture he has been referring to at Abu Ghraib and photos thereof are not the same thing as the 44 photographs Obama reneged on releasing to the ACLU.

In an interview in England. I believe a number of the most grisly photos involve “contractors” who are wearing US Army uniforms, and this is the excuse that Obama is using internally for not releasing them.

as i suspected, the rights obsession with sotomayor’s “latina woman” statement is based on a distortion of what she actually said. to wit:

i am reminded each day that I render decisions that affect people concretely and that I owe them constant and complete vigilance in checking my assumptions, presumptions and perspectives and ensuring that to the extent that my limited abilities and capabilities permit me, that I reevaluate them and change as circumstances and cases before me requires. I can and do aspire to be greater than the sum total of my experiences but I accept my limitations. I willingly accept that we who judge must not deny the differences resulting from experience and heritage but attempt, as the Supreme Court suggests, continuously to judge when those opinions, sympathies and prejudices are appropriate.”

Harry Reid won’t like it. Good.

This time for lying to the White House and thereby the American people, when trying to get the job as Director of Homeland Security as appointed by Bush. Bush chose and appointed a multiple felon, for political reasons, to be in charge of protecting the homeland of the United States.

Will someone ask him if there is “undue influence” in the fact that seven of the court’s nine members are white males? Jim Inhofe is a racist and this is pure racial politics, 1940s Dixiecrat style.